Get ready to uncover the shocking truth about the United States healthcare system as we delve into the eye-opening revelations from the Medical Truth Podcast. Hosted by James Egidio, this podcast takes you on a journey through the untold realities of the American healthcare system. In this blog post, we’ll explore the harrowing story shared by Ms. Greta Crawford, a guest on the podcast, as she reveals the disturbing practices she encountered within the medical system.
The podcast episode begins with James Egidio introducing his guest, Greta Crawford, who experienced the alarming shortcomings of the healthcare system firsthand. Greta’s story is a chilling account of her battle with COVID-19 and the subsequent mistreatment she endured within the hospital walls.
Greta’s story unfolds in August of 2021 when her family returns from a vacation in Florida. Her husband tests positive for COVID-19, setting off a chain reaction that sees the entire family falling ill. As a mother, Greta cares for her family members, and despite her best efforts, she eventually contracts the virus as well.
As her condition worsens, Greta’s husband rushes her to the hospital as her oxygen levels plummet to a dangerous 66%. Greta expresses her initial reluctance to seek medical help due to the concerning reports about the state of hospitals during the pandemic. Her fears are validated as she recounts her experiences within the hospital, where she believes the medical protocols were more harmful than helpful.
Greta’s story takes a shocking turn when she details the medical interventions she received during her hospital stay. She describes how she was administered remdesivir, a drug that she claims to be deadly when given to COVID-19 patients. She asserts that hospitals used this drug to receive financial incentives from the government, making her question the true motivations behind her treatment.
As the podcast continues, Greta recounts the devastating side effects she suffered from the remdesivir treatment. She explains that her lungs flooded, her kidneys started shutting down, and her hands and feet swelled. She describes the excruciating pain and how her overall health deteriorated rapidly. Greta’s experience highlights the shocking disregard for patients’ well-being and the lack of transparency regarding their treatment.
Greta’s resilience shines through as she describes her refusal to accept the harmful treatments and her insistence on natural remedies. Despite facing pressure from medical professionals to get vaccinated and follow their protocols, Greta remains steadfast in her beliefs. She underscores the importance of faith and natural healing methods in her recovery journey.
Greta’s ordeal led her to co-create the website protocolkills.com, a platform aimed at exposing the mistreatment patients have endured within the healthcare system. The website serves as a resource for others to share their stories and raise awareness about the questionable practices happening behind closed doors.
Laura goes on to describe the journey she and her team embarked on to develop documents that would empower patients to assert their rights. She mentions a website, “ourpatientrights.com,” where these documents are available. These documents were inspired by a group of individuals with strong religious beliefs, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, who refuse blood transfusions based on their faith. The idea is to provide patients with tools to protect their rights and make informed decisions about their medical treatments.
The conversation then delves into the key elements of informed consent. Laura highlights that informed consent goes beyond merely signing a form; it involves a comprehensive understanding of the treatment’s risks, benefits, alternatives, and success rates. Patients should have time to process the information, discuss it with their families, and make a decision without any pressure or coercion from medical professionals.
One significant aspect of these documents is holding medical professionals accountable for their actions. Laura emphasizes that doctors must be accountable for their decisions and actions, even when facing external pressures. She likens this accountability to the responsibility of any individual to make ethical choices, regardless of external pressures. The documents provide a legal standing for doctors to refuse treatments that go against patients’ documented informed consent.
A common misconception is that hospitals are solely responsible for medical decisions. Laura clarifies that doctors hold individual responsibility for their actions, even if they operate within a hospital setting. Hospitals provide facilities for doctors to work in but are not responsible for individual treatments. This analogy is drawn by comparing a hair salon to a stylist – if a stylist makes a mistake, it’s the stylist’s responsibility, not the salon’s.
The conversation shifts to the challenges faced by doctors. Laura acknowledges that some doctors are under immense pressure from hospitals, boards, and other authorities to adhere to specific protocols. However, she asserts that doctors must consider the value of a life when making these decisions. Laura brings up cases of doctors who have faced severe consequences for challenging medical norms but emphasizes that these challenges should not prevent doctors from advocating for their patients’ best interests.
Laura underscores the legal protection these documents offer against medical coercion. She explains that while there are legal immunities for hospitals and doctors in the context of COVID treatments, these documents change the narrative. Patients and doctors can now use these documents to assert their rights, holding doctors accountable for willfully ignoring patients’ informed consent. The legal standing provided by these documents empowers doctors to stand up against coercive practices.
Laura wraps up the conversation by discussing how these documents empower good doctors to push back against the system. Armed with notarized consent documents, doctors can confront administrators and CEOs with the legal backing to refuse treatments that go against patients’ documented wishes. This newfound legal support shifts the balance of power and provides a solid foundation for doctors to advocate for their patients’ health and rights.
As the conversation concludes, Laura emphasizes the importance of having these documents notarized and readily available, either as hard copies or digitally, to ensure that patients and their advocates can take swift action when the need arises.
For more resources and information on this topic, you can visit https://www.protocolkills.com/ or https://ourpatientrights.com/. Additionally, listeners can find the interview and relevant PDF files on the Free Resources page of the Medical Truth Podcast website: https://medicaltruthpodcast.com/.
